Infrared period-luminosity relations of Galactic Miras
Hem › Observationer › Variabla stjärnor › Infrared period-luminosity relations of Galactic Miras
- Detta ämne har 0 svar, 1 deltagare, och uppdaterades senast 26-08-18 19:21 av
Thomas Karlsson.
-
FörfattareInlägg
-
-
18 augusti, 2026 kl. 19:21 #15582
Här är en helt färsk artikel om period/luminositet-förhållandet för miror med Stefan Uttenthaler som huvudförfattare.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14775
Om man får skryta lite är en viktig komponent i deras underlag min miradabas med maximum och perioder!
Abstract
Miras and other long-period variable (LPV) stars on the AGB follow period-luminosity (PL) relations. These relations have been difficult to study for Galactic LPVs because their distances were poorly known in the past. We aim to establish the PL relations of solar-neighbourhood Miras for several near-IR photometric bands. To this end, we used multi-epoch photometry from the DIRBE and unTimely/WISE catalogues, Gaia parallax distances, and contemporary pulsation periods obtained from optical observations of a well-selected sample of solar-neighbourhood Miras. We show that clearly defined PL relations in the nine investigated near-IR bands emerge from our data, and we report the slopes and zero-point magnitudes. We find that Galactic Miras are fainter in the K band than their Large Magellanic Cloud siblings. We derive average period-temperature, period-bolometric-luminosity, and period-radius relations from fits to synthetic SEDs constructed from the PL relations. By applying AGB evolutionary models, the scatter of stars around the PL sequences can also be used to test whether the parallax uncertainties quoted in the Gaia catalogue are realistic. Furthermore, we performed such tests based on a comparison with parallaxes obtained with the VLBI and with a sample of LPVs in the globular cluster 47 Tuc. We conclude that, for Galactic Miras with a fractional parallax uncertainty of <0.1 in the Gaia catalogue, the parallax uncertainty is underestimated by factors between 1.0 and 1.8. For more uncertain parallaxes, we find evidence that the distances (parallaxes) are generally overestimated (underestimated). Nevertheless, we find strong evidence that the large error-inflation factors reported for AGB stars in the literature are unrealistic. Our results lend confidence to the parallax measurements of these highly extended, variable stars.
-
-
FörfattareInlägg
- Du måste vara inloggad för att svara på detta ämne.
Senaste diskussionerna
-
Sagittarius 2026
svar av
Olle Eriksson
-
Nova Tau 2026
svar av
Hans Bengtsson
-
Virgohopen
svar av
LasseH
-
Perseiderna 2026
svar av
Hans Bengtsson
-
10P/Tempel 2
svar av
timokarhula
-
The Bauble Nebula
svar av
amv8vantage
-
Månadens bild
svar av
Fredrik Silow
Månadens bild i galleriet
Årets bild i galleriet
Senaste bilderna i forumet
Senaste nytt från SAAF-webben
- Partiell solförmörkelse och Perseider 12 augusti 2026!
- Dags att anmäla sig till Sagittarius 2026!
- Gymnasieprojekt med fjärrteleskopet
- Nystart för SAAF:s fjärrteleskop!
- Årets bild på Nattmolnet 2025!
- Sagittariusträffen, 20–22 augusti på Öland
- Apertur nummer 1 2026!
- Variabelmöte 12/5 – öppet för alla, speciellt nyfikna astrofotografer
- Introduktionsmöte om bildbehandling i Siril, 26 mars
- Årsmöte i SAAF – 16 april 2026
Kalendariet
Antal unika dagsbesökare (unika IP)
Idag: 84 st
Senaste 7 dagarna: 2844 st
Senaste 30 dagarna: 4548 st














